Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://orbit-docs.devotel.io/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
Call Recording Consent
Recording a phone call without proper notification is a criminal offence in most jurisdictions where Orbit operates. This page is the canonical reference for which jurisdictions require one-party, all-party, or explicit-consent recording, and how Orbit’s voice platform helps you comply.How Orbit enforces consent
Every voice number on Orbit carries a per-organization recording-consent policy configured under Voice → Calls → Recording settings. The policy applies to inbound, outbound, and agent-handled legs uniformly. The three announcement modes:| Mode | Behaviour |
|---|---|
none | No recording, or recording with an external consent process you operate yourself. Orbit does not play any announcement. |
announce_inbound | Plays the consent announcement to inbound callers only. Outbound calls dial without an announcement. |
announce_all | Plays the consent announcement to every party on every call — inbound, outbound, and on agent transfer. Required for all two-party-consent jurisdictions. |
.wav / .mp3 file in GCS or any reachable HTTPS endpoint.
Announcements are played before the call connects to the human or
agent leg — never mid-call.
When
announce_all is active, Orbit refuses to start the SIPREC
recording fork until the announcement has finished playing. If the
caller hangs up during the announcement, no recording is captured
and no per-minute recording cost is billed.Jurisdiction matrix
The matrix below summarises the prevailing rule per region. Where a country has subnational variation (US, Canada, Australia), the strictest in-scope state’s rule applies if you route to that jurisdiction.| Region | Rule | Orbit setting |
|---|---|---|
| United States — federal | One-party consent (18 U.S.C. § 2511) | announce_inbound minimum |
| United States — CA, FL, IL, MA, MD, MT, NH, NV, PA, WA | All-party consent by state statute | announce_all required |
| United States — other 38 states | One-party consent suffices | announce_inbound acceptable |
| European Union | GDPR Art 6 lawful basis + ePrivacy Art 5(1) — explicit consent or another documented basis | announce_all recommended |
| United Kingdom | UK GDPR + PECR + RIPA — broadly mirrors EU posture | announce_all recommended |
| Canada — federal (PIPEDA) | Implied consent acceptable for QA with clear notice; explicit consent for marketing | announce_all recommended |
| Canada — Quebec (Law 25) | Stricter than PIPEDA; treat as explicit-consent | announce_all required |
| Australia — ACT, QLD, SA, WA | One-party consent | announce_inbound acceptable |
| Australia — NSW, VIC, TAS, NT | All-party consent under state Surveillance Devices Acts | announce_all required |
| UAE, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Turkey, India | Treat as all-party / explicit consent — unauthorised recording is criminal in most cases | announce_all required |
| Brazil (LGPD), Argentina, Chile | Explicit consent + documented lawful basis | announce_all required |
| Any other jurisdiction | Operator’s responsibility to verify; default to announce_all until counsel confirms otherwise | announce_all (default) |
Per-region detail
United States — federal vs. state
United States — federal vs. state
Federal wiretap law (18 U.S.C. § 2511) permits recording when at
least one party to the call consents — and the recording party
counts as that one party. Ten states layer an all-party-consent
requirement on top: California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland,
Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania,
Washington. The applicable rule is determined by where the
parties are physically located at the time of the call, not the
location of the carrier or the dashboard operator. If any party
is in an all-party state, that state’s rule governs.Industry overlays: HIPAA (treat call audio as PHI when it
discusses health), PCI DSS (do not record DTMF tones that
capture card numbers — use Orbit’s PCI mask feature), FDCPA /
TCPA (debt collection and telemarketing have additional
notice requirements beyond recording consent).
European Union / United Kingdom
European Union / United Kingdom
Under GDPR Art 6, recording requires a documented lawful
basis (consent, contract performance, legitimate interest,
legal obligation, etc.). ePrivacy Directive Art 5(1) layers
on a confidentiality-of-communications requirement that, in
most member-state implementations, is read as requiring
explicit notification before recording starts. The UK applies
the equivalent regime via UK GDPR, PECR, and RIPA.The pragmatic posture: play the announcement to every party
(
announce_all), keep a record of the legal basis (consent,
legitimate_interest, etc.) in your CRM, and ensure the
customer can request access or deletion of recordings via your
GDPR data-subject-rights process. Orbit’s retention policy
(configurable per channel under Settings → Compliance →
Retention) lets you auto-delete recordings after a fixed
window.Canada
Canada
PIPEDA (federal, applies to commercial activity) treats
recording as a collection of personal information and requires
knowledge and consent at the time of collection. For
quality-assurance recording with a clear, prominent notice at
the start of the call, regulators have accepted implied
consent. For marketing or sales-evaluation recording,
explicit consent is the safer posture. Quebec’s Law 25
(in force since 2023) is stricter than PIPEDA and is best
treated as an explicit-consent regime.
Australia
Australia
Recording is governed by state Surveillance Devices Acts, not
federal law. ACT, QLD, SA, and WA are one-party-consent
jurisdictions. NSW, VIC, TAS, and NT require all-party
consent. The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act
1979 (Cth) also prohibits intercepting a call in transit
without a warrant, but does not generally restrict consensual
recording by a party to the call.
Other regions — default to announce_all
Other regions — default to announce_all
UAE, Saudi Arabia, Korea, Turkey, and India all treat
unauthorised recording as a criminal offence under their
respective penal or telecommunications codes. Brazil’s LGPD,
Argentina’s Personal Data Protection Act, and Chile’s Law
19.628 all require an explicit lawful basis plus notice. For
every region not separately listed above, treat the default as
announce_all plus documented consent capture, and confirm
with local counsel before routing production traffic.Operator obligations
Orbit gives you the controls; the obligations remain yours.Choose the strictest applicable rule
If your call may traverse a jurisdiction with all-party-consent,
configure
announce_all for the entire org — not just for
numbers serving that region. Cross-jurisdictional liability is
determined by the strictest state on the call.Document your lawful basis
For GDPR / LGPD / PIPEDA destinations, keep a record per
contact of which lawful basis applies and how it was captured.
Orbit’s contact custom fields can store this; export them
quarterly to your compliance system.
Honour deletion requests
GDPR Art 17, CCPA, and Quebec Law 25 give data subjects the
right to request deletion of their recordings. Orbit exposes
a per-contact delete endpoint and a retention-policy scheduler.
Build the request flow into your support process.
Mask sensitive audio
Pause recording (or mute the recording leg) before capturing
card numbers, full SSNs, or health-screening responses. Orbit
supports mid-call recording-pause via the API for PCI-scope
flows.
Where to configure
- Per-org default: Voice → Calls → Recording settings. This picks the announcement mode and the TTS / audio URL.
- Per-number override: Numbers → <select number> → Compliance → Recording. Useful when one DID serves a stricter jurisdiction than the org default.
- Per-agent: Agents → <agent> → Voice → Recording. Agents can disable recording on specific call types (e.g. PCI-scope payment flows).
Related references
- HIPAA Compliance — PHI handling for recorded healthcare calls.
- PCI DSS — PCI scope and DTMF masking.
- SOC 2 Controls — recording-access audit controls.
- Emergency Calling — why 911 / 112 / 999 / 000 are blocked and what callers should do instead.